top of page
  • Writer's pictureBethany Crystal

Measuring the impact of a VC platform strategy

Cory Bolotosky of True Search  (and formerly of Underscore VC) does a nice summary of a few of the biggest impact ways he sees platform teams doing for their companies: https://twitter.com/bolotsky/status/1084559586416381952 But of course, it does beg a series of questions about the intended output of all of this work:

  1. If 100% of VC firms are now offering events and programming to their portfolio companies, does it dilute the overall impact?

  2. Are these services becoming commoditized to the point of them being meaningless?

  3. And -- If you can't prove the direct link from any of these singular efforts, is it even worth having these teams at all?

Measuring what matters There's something elegant and lovely about that idea that Andrew Oddo of Bowery Capital proposes here: https://twitter.com/A0ddo/status/1084552566199996416 But of course, it's impossible *really* attribute anything as 100% pure. Like any marketing effort, a single touchpoint is only a piece of the puzzle. Did you decide to eat McDonald's for lunch because you saw a TV ad earlier in the week, because you stumbled across one of your old McDonald's toys in your bedroom, or because you smelled the unmistakable scent of greasy French fries when walking past the restaurant? In the end, the outcome was probably a little bit of all of those, combined with one other thing that marketers have no control over: You were hungry. The work I do in VC is very similar. Maybe somebody learned a new way to approach a technical problem at one of our summits, but who's to say they didn't already read a blog post about that? Or that somebody brought up that same topic in a board meeting? And even if you can prove they did this new thing, do you measure that in minutes of time saved? In dollars and in cents? You can drive yourself crazy trying to track this stuff. (And trust me, I have.) Truth be told, this is something that I have struggled with since day one of joining USV back in 2016. As someone who came over the VC from the operating side, my tendency to measure as much as possible to "prove" my value certainly came off quite strong. One of the early questions I had when I joined the firm was: "Well, who's in the network? And what do they want?" This first one (who are they?) proved to be really hard for us to answer. We had different snippets of information about different people over time (some from Slack, some via email, some via newsletters, and a lot in people's brains), but none of it was consistent. People changed jobs, they grew out of one role and into another, or their email addresses bounced and with them, we lost all of the valuable insights that they may have been able to offer other emerging leaders who came after them. As a result, I spent my first year at the firm capturing as much information as possible about our companies, our programming, and the people who engage with USV from up and down the network. This was pretty tedious. For us, that's a meaningful chunk of folks. We estimate that we have about 10,000 people across our now 75-company network. In any given year, about 3,000 show up for one of our 150+ events. We also manage a Slack channel that's 3,500 members and growing. Admittedly, I went down two or three or four "data pits" or rabbitholes along the way that probably sucked months of my time and sanity out along the way. But there is one thing this exercise taught me: Because the timeline of venture capital will always be longer than the timeline of any one employee at one of our companies, our system needs to be designed to outlive a typical life span of an employee. (And that's hard to do.) Now, our firm has been around long enough where we're seeing people start to "come back" to USV -- either as entrepreneurs, as senior-level hires at other companies, or even as mentors or advisors. To me, this is one pretty clear measure of success. And that's why this is an area that we are investing in more today at USV. But even this "impact" is pretty squishy. It's not like I'm going to set a KPI around it for 2019. If you think back to the earlier examples about McDonald's, in the end, only one thing matters to their marketing team: "Do people think to eat there when they are hungry?" The same is true for the USV Network. The question I ask is, "Do people think to come here when they have a question or want to learn?" If we can't say yes to that, then we aren't doing our jobs well enough yet. And if, when they do think to come to the network when they have a business question or a sticking point they'd like to talk through with industry peers, but we fail to help them, then we've lost out on a huge opportunity. And if you look at it this way, then we have a long way to go.

0 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Five Lessons Learned from Co-Working with the CEO It’s really hard to get a broad business perspective when you’re in every conversation. The main way that I interact with colleagues today is through

bottom of page